The build-vs-buy question comes up in every enterprise evaluation. Engineering leaders rightfully ask whether they could build something equivalent internally. The honest answer: yes, you could — but the total cost of ownership is typically 5-10x higher than deploying AXIOM, and the timeline extends from weeks to years.
Consider the components: you need email integration (IMAP/SMTP/Graph API), calendar sync (CalDAV/Exchange), meeting recording and transcription (WebSocket audio pipelines, speech-to-text), a policy engine with Rego evaluation, a multi-tenant database with row-level security, an LLM routing layer with provider abstraction, a persistent memory system, voice telephony integration, and a web dashboard. Each of these is a significant engineering effort. Then multiply by ongoing maintenance: API changes, security patches, model updates, and compliance requirements. AXIOM's 8-phase, 22-week build plan represents thousands of engineering hours — and that is with a team that has already solved these problems.
Back to BlogComparisons
AXIOM vs. Building Your Own: A Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
Jan 20, 202610 min read
ComparisonsView all posts
Continue Reading
Product Updates
Introducing AXIOM 2.0: Unified AI Operations for the Enterprise
Today we are launching AXIOM 2.0 with a redesigned policy engine, expanded memory systems, and native air-gap deployment support. Here is what is new and why it matters.
Feb 18, 20265 min read
Use Cases
How a 500-Person Law Firm Replaced 9 Tools with AXIOM
Goldstein & Associates was spending $1.2M annually on disconnected AI tools. Within 90 days of deploying AXIOM, they consolidated to a single platform and cut costs by 68%.
Feb 12, 20268 min read
Ready to replace 9 tools with one?
Free for teams under 5. No credit card required.